THE BRCA-P
CLINICAL TRIAL

The Breast Cancer Trials BRCA-P clinical trial is testing the effectiveness of a drug called Denosumab to decrease or prevent the risk of developing breast cancer in women who carry a BRCA1 gene mutation.

What Is The Aim Of The BRCA-P Clinical Trial?

The Breast Cancer Trials BRCA-P clinical trial is testing the effectiveness of using a drug called Denosumab to decrease or prevent the risk of developing breast cancer in women who carry a BRCA1 gene mutation.

Breast Cancer Trials is a group of world-leading breast cancer doctors and researchers based in Australia and New Zealand with a commitment to exploring and finding better treatments for people affected by breast cancer through clinical trials research.

Denosumab is an antibody that neutralises a molecule called RANK ligand. Switching off RANK ligand with Denosumab has been shown in other research to strengthen bone function for people with weak bones (osteoporosis) and to improve outcomes for women whose breast cancer has spread to the bone.

Recent laboratory studies suggest that switching off RANK ligand with Denosumab could also target the culprit cell that gives rise to breast cancer in women with the BRCA1 gene mutation. The BRCA1gene mutation has been shown in the laboratory to result in a hypersensitive signalling pathway involving RANK ligand. Denosumab may be able to switch this pathway off.

Denosumab is approved in Australia for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal people and for the prevention of bone-related problems in adults with bone metastases due to cancer.

The BRCA-P prevention clinical trial has been fast-tracked from the laboratory because of the very positive pre-clinical data seen and because a Phase III clinical trial can provide the large numbers of participants needed to find out if it is effective in the shortest timeframe.

Currently, many women with a BRCA gene mutation undertake preventative measures to prevent breast and ovarian cancer, including the surgical removal of their breasts and ovaries. The BRCA-P clinical trial hopes to offer these women another prevention option.

What Is A BRCA1 or BRCA2 Gene Mutation?

Most inherited cases of breast cancer are associated with mutations in one of two genes: BRCA1 (BReast CAncer gene 1) and BRCA2 (BReast CAncer gene 2).

Everyone has BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The function of the BRCA genes is to repair DNA damage in a cell and keep breast, ovarian, and other cells growing normally. An inherited mutation in a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene means that one of the copies of the gene is not working but that the other copy can maintain the normal function. It is when the second copy of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene acquires a mutation that both copies are now non-functional, and the wrong protein is made.

With two non-functional copies making the wrong protein, the ability of the cell to repair DNA damage is affected. If DNA damage cannot be repaired, but the cell remains alive, the cell may become cancerous by growing uncontrollably and forming a tumour mass.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations account for about 5-10% of breast cancer diagnoses in Australia today.

Who Can This Affect?

Breast cancers associated with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation tend to develop in younger women where the incidence becomes significant in their 30s and 40s.

You are more likely to have a genetic mutation linked to breast cancer if:

  • You have blood relatives (grandmothers, mother, sisters, aunts) on either your mother’s or father’s side of the family who had breast cancer diagnosed before age 40.
  • There is both breast and ovarian cancer on the same side of the family or in a single individual.
  • You have a relative(s) with triple-negative breast cancer diagnosed before age 50.
  • There are other cancers in your family in addition to breast or ovarian cancer, such as prostate, melanoma or pancreatic cancer.
  • Women in your family have had cancer in both breasts.
  • You are of Ashkenazi Jewish (Eastern European) heritage.
  • A man in your family has had breast cancer.
  • There is a known abnormal breast cancer gene in your family.

If you think you are at high risk for a genetic mutation linked to breast cancer, see your doctor. Usually, the first person to be tested for a mutation is the person who has been affect by cancer, and if a mutation is found in that person, other family members can be tested.

What Is The Risk Of Breast Cancer for Women With A BRCA1 or BRCA2 Gene Mutation?

It is estimated that in Australia today, about 1 in 400 women are at the highest risk of breast cancer because they carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation.

For these people, carrying a gene mutation is associated with an approximate 70% risk of developing breast cancer over the course of their lifetime. And they can have a risk of up to 40% of developing ovarian cancer.

Many of those at this highest risk of breast cancer will not be aware they carry a breast cancer gene mutation until they are diagnosed with breast cancer themselves or a close family member is diagnosed. Each of them will have the potential to pass this inherited gene mutation to their children.

Jewish women of eastern European ancestry (Ashkenazi) are more likely to carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation, estimated to be present in about 1 in 40 women. This is 20 times more common than in the general population.

How Will This Trial Be Conducted?

The BRCA-P trial will be led internationally by our colleagues at the Austrian Breast Cancer Study Group and conducted in Australia by Breast Cancer Trials (BCT). Professor Geoffrey Lindeman is the BCT Study Chair of the trial and the global co-Principal Investigator.

Throughout Australia, 15 sites will be open to patient recruitment together with six other countries including Austria, Germany, Israel, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States.

The international recruitment target is 2,918 participants and Australia will recruit 300 participants over a two-year period. The trial will include five years of active treatment comprising six monthly injections of the drug together with annual follow ups and required tests. Participants will be followed up every 12 months for a further five years of post-treatment assessment.

The trial will be a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study meaning that participants will be randomly allocated to receive either the trial drug or a placebo and neither the participant nor their doctor will know who is on the study drug and who is receiving the placebo. This will ensure the trial results and reporting will be unaffected by any potential bias.

Who Can Participate In This Clinical Trial?

The BRCA-P clinical trial is a prevention clinical trial, therefore potential participants are those who have not had breast cancer but who carry the BRCA1 gene mutation and therefore are at higher risk.

Eligibility must be assessed carefully and includes the following criteria:

  • Women who carry a BRCA1 gene mutation and are aged 25-55 years and unaffected by breast or ovarian cancer.
  • May be either pre or post-menopausal.
  • Not pregnant
  • Have not had preventative breast surgery.
  • Not taking any breast cancer preventative agents such as Tamoxifen or an Aromatase Inhibitor.

Many people who participate in breast cancer prevention clinical trials do so in the hope that the trial results will influence and change the future for their children and following generations.

They may also benefit from access to the treatment being trialled, and all participants benefit from the close follow up the trial provides in monitoring their breast cancer risk.

Why Is It Only For People With The BRCA1 Gene Mutation?

The pre-clinical evidence supports potential activity for denosumab in women with a faulty BRCA1 gene. There is not sufficient data to as yet to support a clinical trial in other high-risk women, such as those with a BRCA2 mutation.

Why Is There An Age Limit On This Clinical Trial?

The annual incidence of breast cancer is highest in their 30-50’s for women with a faulty BRCA1 gene so the study is focussing on this group of women in order to see if the incidence of breast cancers can be reduced. There is also strong pre-clinical evidence to support the evaluation of denosumab in pre-menopausal women.

Why Can Only Women Participate In This Clinical Trial?

Although the relative risk of developing male breast cancer is high for BRCA1 mutation carriers compared to men without a faulty gene, the absolute risk of breast cancer in men is low (~1.2% to age 70; JNCI 2007).

Put another way, male breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers is rare, by comparison the average lifetime risk of breast cancer for a healthy woman is ~12.5%.

We would have to increase the size of the study to treat thousands of men, with very little (if any) benefit seen in the vast majority. Inclusion of male subjects is not therefore feasible. However, if we do see a benefit for women, this could be addressed in men.

Where Can I Participate?

The BRCA-P clinical trial will be open by Breast Cancer Trials in 15 medical institutions throughout Australia. You can sign up to receive updates on the trial, including when each site opens, here.

The trial will open at:

  • The Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre (Austin Hospital)
  • Ballarat Oncology and Haematology Services
  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital
  • Lake Macquarie Private Hospital
  • Monash Medical Centre (Clayton)
  • Prince of Wales Hospital
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital
  • Royal Hobart Hospital
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • Royal North Shore Hospital
  • St John of God Hospital Subiaco
  • St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney
  • Westmead Hospital
  • Wollongong Hospital

See all BRCA-P Site Contact details here.

I Have A Strong Family History Of Breast Cancer. How Do I Find Out If I Have A BRCA Gene Mutation?

Genetic testing is often offered to women who are diagnosed with breast cancer at an early age (35 and under), who have a strong family history or who are diagnosed with certain types of breast cancer such as ‘triple negative breast cancer’.

If a gene mutation such as in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (the most common types) is identified, this can be associated with a family history of breast, ovarian, prostate and some other types of cancer. It is important to note that family history can come from your mother or father’s side of the family.

Genetic testing is offered only through a Familial cancer clinic. If a woman is referred to a Familial cancer clinic, the availability, limitations, potential benefits, and possible consequences of genetic testing will be discussed with her. If you are concerned about your strong family history of breast cancer, or you have a close family member with a BRCA gene mutation, speak with your doctor about a referral to a family cancer clinic.

Remember, having a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation doesn’t mean you will be diagnosed with breast cancer and if one family member has a genetic mutation linked to breast cancer, it does not mean that all family members will have it.

You can learn more about genetic testing here.

Will This Research Help To Prevent Other Cancers As Well?

The BRCA-P clinical trial may also lead to significant information related to the treatment of ovarian cancer, other types of cancer and bone related issues such as osteoporosis.

In this way, the results of one clinical trial may affect many thousands of people across different areas of medical research and community concern.

How Can I Help?

Breast Cancer Trials understands that what is learned from this prevention trial will be very important to many people, in particular individuals and families who carry the BRCA1 gene mutation.

If you think you meet the eligibility criteria for the BRCA-P clinical trial, please speak with your Familial Cancer Centre or GP about referral to a site that is participating in the BRCA-P clinical trial.

The BRCA-P clinical trial will cost about $7.5 million to conduct in Australia. The National Health and Medical Research Council has supported the trial with a peer-reviewed grant of $2.8 million, indicating the value of this research to the long-term health of Australians.

However, more funding is needed to ensure this important research is conducted.

If you can help, please make a donation to the trial here. By joining our Regular Giving Program and committing to a monthly gift, you’ll be investing in a brighter future for our families and loved ones.

If you’d like to keep up to date about all of Breast Cancer Trials life-saving research, you can subscribe to the Breast Cancer Trials Podcast, or follow us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, LinkedIn and Instagram.

QUICK ACCESS

Professor Geoffrey Lindeman

Professor Geoffrey Lindeman is a clinician-scientist, Joint Head of the Stem Cells and Cancer Division at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (‘WEHI’); medical oncologist at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital; Professorial Fellow in the Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne; and leads the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Translational Breast Cancer Research. He is also the Study Chair of the BRCA-P Clinical Trial.

Support Us

Help us to change lives through breast cancer clinical trials research

Latest Articles

navigating breast cancer and participating in the cambria-2 clinical trial
breast cancer ultrasound

Breast Cancer Ultrasound

split-banner-image

GENETIC TESTING
FOR BREAST CANCER

Cancer Geneticist Associate Professor Judy Kirk explains who should get genetic testing for breast cancer, what exactly a ‘strong family history’ means and how you can get testing.

What Is Genetic Testing?

Genetic testing involves looking for a fault or mutation in genes that cause a high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer within a family. These mutations are often found in the BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 genes. Genetic testing for breast cancer testing is done on a blood sample, usually starting with an affected family member. If a gene mutation is detected, other family members can be tested. This is known as predictive genetic testing.

Genetic testing is typically offered through a cancer clinic if appropriate, and a referral to a familial cancer clinic is arranged to consider genetic testing. Before testing occurs, you are counselled about the process to understand the potential implications.

Associate Professor Judy Kirk is a cancer geneticist at the Familial Cancer Service at Westmead Hospital.

She says genetic testing is looking for a mistake in the gene that causes a high risk of breast and ovarian cancer within a family.

“It’s testing that’s done on blood, in a family with a pretty strong family history of breast cancer where we would start by testing an affected family member.”

“Usually, we test a woman who’s had either breast or ovarian cancer, and we search a number of different genes to try and find a fault or mutation, that’s passed down through the family that causes that high risk,” she said.

“When we do that, there are a number of different genes that we can test and the ones that relate to breast cancer are two genes we’ve known about now for over 20 years. One of them is called BRCA1, the breast cancer one gene, and the other called BRCA2, the breast cancer two gene, and more recently it’s been found that mutations in another gene, known as PALB2 also cause a higher risk of breast cancer.”

Listen to the podcast

Cancer Geneticist Associate Professor Judy Kirk explains who should get genetic testing, what exactly a ‘strong family history’ means and how you can get tested. Find out more in this podcast episode.

key take away icon

Key takeaways

  • Genetic testing isn’t for everyone: it’s most valuable when there’s a strong family history or specific cancer indicators, and testing usually begins with an affected family member.
  • We’re looking for gene mutations: BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 are genes everyone has, but inherited faults in these genes can significantly increase breast cancer risk.
  • Early action means more tailored prevention: women with high-risk gene mutations can reduce their risk with earlier, more frequent screening, and in some cases, preventive surgeries.
  • Breast cancer risk can come from either side of the family: paternal history is just as important as maternal when deciding who should be tested.

Who Should Consider Genetic Testing?

Genetic testing for breast cancer is a crucial tool in identifying individuals at risk. You may consider it if you meet any of the criteria below:

  • Personal History of Cancer: According to Harvard Medical School, individuals with a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer, especially if diagnosed at age 50 or younger. Males with breast cancer at any age should consider testing.
  • Family History of Cancer: Individuals with two or more close family members (parents, siblings, and/or children) with a history of breast or ovarian cancer should consider testing.
  • Known BRCA1 or BRCA2 Gene Mutations: If there is a family history of BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations, genetic testing is recommended.
  • Ashkenazi Jewish Heritage: Individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent are at a higher risk.

In the first instance, a genetic test is done on a family member who has been affected by breast cancer. If the immediately affected family member has died or cannot be tested, other family members can still choose to be tested.

The information gained from the test can only be used for that individual tested and cannot tell us about the entire family. If no genetic fault is found in the tested individual, it is reassuring but does not rule out the possibility of a genetic fault in the family. Each family member would need to undergo genetic testing to understand their own risk.

Genetic testing for breast cancer is typically offered only through a cancer clinic where benefits and possible consequences of genetic testing will be discussed with the individual.

Genetic testing is a complex process and should always be undertaken with appropriate counselling and an understanding of the potential implications.

“I originally got tested for the BRCA mutation after my Auntie was diagnosed with breast cancer. She was 47. And then when my cousin turned 30 and she was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2013. So, all of my family started getting tested at that point which included myself and in 2015 I found out I carried the gene mutation,” Skye said. Learn more about Skye’s story. 

 

bct brca p glenroy 137242 | 1

What is a ‘Strong Family History’?

Associate Professor Kirk said a ‘strong family history’ is when there are two or more affected family members on one side of the family. Sometimes, individuals may not know this information, or their family may be predominantly male. In these cases, other factors are considered:

  • Early age at breast cancer diagnosis.
  • Presence of triple-negative breast cancer.
  • High-grade, invasive epithelial ovarian cancer.

“Inherited gene mutations are not necessarily more common on the mother’s side of the family. Both sides of the family are equally more important in assessing risk”, she said.

“There are other things that we might look for, and they would include: early age at breast cancer diagnosis, the presence of triple negative breast cancer in a young woman, less than 50 years of age at diagnosis, ovarian cancer specifically high grade, invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Most women with that type of cancer is now offered a genetic test.”

What Happens if you Test Positive for the BRCA Gene?

If your test results identify a mutation in the BRCA gene, a personalised risk management plan is developed. Individuals with the BRCA1 gene mutation would typically commence their breast screening from age 30 in a specialised risk management clinic. This offers the expertise as well as the access to breast MRI for screening in addition to mammography or ultrasound. Additionally, these individuals are also given the option of risk-reducing surgery to remove all breast tissue, which is chosen by approximately 30% of high-risk women.

The BRCA 1 or 2 gene mutations also increase the risk of developing ovarian cancer. As there is no screening test for ovarian cancer, the best option is to consider surgery to remove the ovaries and fallopian tubes once a woman has finished their family by about the age 30.

“They usually start it in a risk management clinic where there’s special expertise and the availability of breast MRI for screening rather than simply mammography ultrasound and of course, those women are also given the opportunity risk reducing surgery for the breast tissue, which is taken up by maybe about 30% of high-risk women,” Associate Professor Kirk said.

“Many choose to have screening, but I think the more important thing is that these women, if they have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, are also at very high risk of ovarian cancer.”

“So it’s very important to identify these women because we can save lives from cancer if we look after them appropriately.”

Genetic Counselling

Genetic counselling typically involves:

  • Risk Assessment: Genetic counselling begins with a risk assessment based on your personal and family history of breast cancer. This can help determine your likelihood of having an inherited BRCA gene mutation.
  • Education: Genetic counsellors provide information about inherited gene changes that can increase breast cancer risk, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations.
  • Testing Considerations: Genetic counsellors discuss the pros and cons of genetic testing, helping you understand what genetic testing can and cannot tell you before these tests are done. It is important to understand the implications for insurance and impacts on other family members.
  • Support: Genetic counsellors provide resources and support to help you and your family make informed decisions about genetic testing.

What is the Life Expectancy of Someone with the BRCA Gene?

Individuals with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations have an increased risk of developing certain cancers, particularly breast and ovarian cancers. However, having a BRCA gene mutation does not directly affect life expectancy.

The specific impact on life expectancy depends on various factors, including the individual’s overall health, access to medical care, early detection, and the effectiveness of preventative measures taken.

Where Can I Get Genetic Testing in Australia?

If you have a strong family history and would like to be tested, Associate Professor Kirk said to contact your local familiar cancer clinic.

“Most of this genetic testing is done through specialist clinics, either private or public and the genetic testing is covered by the system either Medicare or by the state health departments where it’s quite likely that we’ll find something, perhaps an over 10% chance that we’re going to find something.”

“If the chance is less than that, it tends not to be covered by the system and in that case the patient can pay for that testing,” she said.

“Again, it’s usually done through a specialist familiar cancer service, so that they understand the limitations of the testing in that circumstance and the implications of insurance and for other family members etc.”

“So, they’re fully informed before the testing about what could be expected, what genes are going to be tested and what could be the impact of finding something or finding nothing in some situations.”

QUICK ACCESS

profile image

Associate Professor Judy Kirk

Associate Professor Judy Kirk is a cancer geneticist at the Familiar Cancer Service at Westmead Hospital.

More research into genetic testing is needed.

Listen Now: Should You Get Genetic Testing?

Cancer geneticist Associate Professor Judy Kirk shares who should get breast cancer genetic testing, what counts as a strong family history, and how to access it.

Podcast Transcript

  • Breast Cancer Genetic Testing: Should You Get It?

    Genetic testing helps to estimate your risk of developing cancer in your lifetime, by searching for specific changes in your genes, chromosomes or proteins. But it’s not advisable for everyone to undertake genetic testing. To help understand who should get genetic testing, what exactly a strong family history means, and how you can get tested, we sat down with cancer geneticist Associate Professor Judy Kirk from the Familial Cancer Service at Westmead Hospital. 

    “Genetic testing comes in various forms, but what we’re talking about today is looking for a mistake in the gene that causes a high risk of breast cancer within a family. That’s testing that’s done with blood, in a family with a pretty strong family history of breast cancer, where we would start by testing an affected family member first, usually a woman who had breast cancer and we search a number of different genes to try and find a fault or mutation that’s passed down in the family and causes that high risk. And when we do that, there are a number of different genes that we can test, and the ones that I talked about mainly today that are in relation to breast cancer are two genes that we’ve known about for over twenty years. One of them is called BRCA1, the breast cancer one gene, the other is called BRCA2, the breast cancer two gene and more recently, it’s been found that mutations in another gene, known as PALB2, also cause a higher risk of breast cancer. So those are the genes that are routinely tested first when you’re trying to ascertain the cause of breast and ovarian cancer in a family. 

    I also spoke about some other genes which are related to breast cancer; there are a few different ones, TB53 and P10, that cause quite unique features in a family. So generally we don’t necessarily test those other genes unless there’s a specific indication for that, where the family history leads us away from the usual culprits. So when you’re testing families with breast cancer, only a small number have a gene fault that causes it, and usually it’s in a gene such as BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2. So these are normal genes that we’ve all got, but some people have a mistake in the gene that causes a problem. 

    Usually, people who undergo this testing have a strong family history. What’s considered a strong family history?

    Generally, it’s three or more affected family members, but there are other features, all on one side of the family. If people are looking for information about this, EVIQ is a good resource that talks about the type of people who are not so much eligible for genetic testing, but for the sorts of families that genetic testing might help. However, often we look for a family history and sometimes people don’t know their family, or their family is all male, so they won’t have as strong a family history.

    There are other things that we might look for, and they would include: early age at breast cancer diagnosis, the presence of triple negative breast cancer in a young woman (less than 50 years old), things like ovarian cancer, specifically high-grade invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Most women with that type of cancer are offered a genetic test. Increasingly, those tests have been covered up until now (where its likely to be useful) by the state health departments at public genetics clinics but from November 2017, there have been some medicare item numbers specifically for testing those genes: BRCA1, BRCA2 and a couple of other genes.

    Usually, in an affected family member, to try and find the cause first and then once you’ve found the gene mutation that’s caused the problem, those medicare item numbers cover what’s called the predictive testing of other family members to see if they’ve got that faulty gene or not. And there’s a consequence of that, for people with the faulty gene, let’s say BRCA1, will start their screening from 30, they usually start it in a risk management clinic where there’s special expertise and the availability of breast MRI for screening rather than simply a mammogram and ultrasound.

    Of course, those women are also given the opportunity of having risk-reducing surgery for the breast tissue, which is taken up by maybe 30% of high-risk women, many choose to have screening. I think the most important thing is that these women, if they have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, are also at very high risk of ovarian cancer. There is no screening test for that. And so once they finish their family by about age 40, the best approach at the moment is to remove the ovaries and fallopian tubes and that is the single most important thing that saves lives in these families. So it’s very important to identify these women because we can save lives from cancer if we look after them appropriately.

    People go and they get the BRCA1 or BRCA2 test, it sometimes comes up negative, but there is that strong family history. You’ve mentioned there are other indicators and that you’ll go and test for – what are those indicators and what would push you to further test these patients? 

    Remember that genetic testing usually starts with an affected family member, rather than the unaffected family member. If that affected family member with breast cancer for example, has black spots around their mouth and a history of terrible polyps which have been problematic from their childhood, we would know that that person probably has a mutation in a completely different gene, STK11 and that causes that problem of Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome where there is a high risk of breast cancer but they’ve usually presented earlier because of polyps and even the spots around their mouth. Another example would be that, for a family where there is a problem in the gene for P53, there’s often a different problem in the family history that might involve early breast cancer, even in the twenties, but often really a devastating history of childhood cancers, multiple cancers in the same person, unusual and young cancers, so it’s very important to take a full family history for all different sorts of cancers and then try to put together the picture so you can work out which genes are most appropriate to test. 

    The process starts with testing someone who has breast cancer – does it fall maybe through the father’s side, the mother’s side, or is it more common on one side? 

    Well, the answer to that is definitely not. Very often, it’s distressing to hear people who say “Oh yes, they didn’t worry about my family history because it’s on my dad’s side.” But actually it’s equally important and so while we don’t add the two sides of the family together. We always take the mum’s side, we always take the dad’s side, and we act on the side that looks more worrisome.

    You test the person affected by breast cancer first. What if there isn’t somebody, what if it’s a daughter who has lost their mother? Are they able to go and get screened?

    They are. That testing is not covered by the system. That would be an out-of-pocket expense, but much less so than it used to be for that sort of testing. The thing is, if you find nothing in that woman, that’s quite reassuring. But you still don’t know if there’s a genetic fault in the family. So that young woman would be tested, and then her sisters would be no better off. Each sister would have to have the genetic testing in order to reassure themselves about themselves and their family. So if you can, it’s wisest to do it in the way I explained.  But of course, sometimes we don’t have that opportunity, and so a person can have a genetic test that gives more information for themselves rather than for the broader family. 

    How do people get these tests in that situation? Do they need a referral? Are you getting a lot of people just calling up, mentioning, “I would like this test”?

    No, surprisingly, we don’t. Unfortunately, I mean, GPs don’t know a lot about these things and so there are guidelines about who should be referred and where genetic testing is most likely to be useful in the first instance. Most of this genetic testing is done through specialist clinics, either private or public, and the genetic testing is covered by the system, either Medicare or by the state health departments where it’s quite likely where we will find something (perhaps an over 10% chance that we’re going to find something). If the chance is less than that it tends not to be covered by the system and in that case the patient can pay for that testing, again usually done through a specialist family cancer service so that they understand the limitations of the testing in that circumstance and the implications for insurance and other family members etc. so they’re fully informed before the testing about what could be expected, what genes are going to be tested and what would be the impact of finding something, or finding nothing in some situations. 

    That was Associate Professor Judy Kirk from Westmead Hospital’s Familial Cancer Service. If you’d like to learn more about Breast Cancer Trials or you’d like to support our life-saving research, follow us on social media, or visit our website at breastcancertrials.org.au  

Latest Articles

navigating breast cancer and participating in the cambria-2 clinical trial
breast cancer ultrasound

Breast Cancer Ultrasound

split-banner-image

BREAST CANCER WHEN YOU ARE A YOUNG WORKING DOCTOR

Gowri Sivalingam was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2015 with invasive ductal carcinoma after finding a lump in her breast on Christmas day.

Dr Gowri Sivalingam’s Diagnosis

There can be a lot of confusion after receiving a breast cancer diagnosis, as you are suddenly exposed to a whole new language and environment.

However, Dr Gowri Sivalingam understood exactly what her diagnosis meant.

Gowri is a paediatric surgeon and she was diagnosed four years ago with invasive ductal carcinoma.

However, she said she initially thought it was improbable that the lump she found on Christmas day in 2015 could be breast cancer.

“I just felt a sharp pang of pain and I know that breast cancer isn’t painful, lumps are not tender, but I felt this sharp pain which brought my attention to it and I felt the lump there.”

“But the pain disappeared after it came and then I thought, I’m too young for it to be anything and because I’m a Doctor I started thinking it’s probably fat necrosis,” she said.

“So I went back to work on Monday and I’m pretty close to one of my consultants in Perth and I told her about it and she felt it and she said ‘you need to go and have an ultrasound’ and I thought, ‘I can’t. I’m on call today. Look I’m holding the on-call phone, I can’t go.’ And she looked at me and said ‘you can give the on-call phone to someone else’ and she went and grabbed a ultrasound form and she wrote it out and she said ‘call and go now.’ I said ‘OK’.”

She said she went for the ultrasound but couldn’t wait for the results.

“I had one of my residents call up and tell them to fax the results over to the office, which is not something you’re supposed to do.”

“But I just couldn’t wait because my appointment with the consultant was the following week on a Monday, and I was just too nervous about getting the results and I knew no one would tell me over the phone,” she said.

“That’s not something that is usually is done. They’ll call you to consulting room and break the news to you.”

“So, I had it faxed over and the I read the first part of it and then I ran to the staircase and I sat there, and I cried for a bit. I think I literally cried for like five minutes.”

She said she then called her mother who insisted on her getting a second opinion.

“I knew what it meant and I knew a pathological tissue diagnosis wasn’t going to change.”

“So, I tried to explain that, and it took a couple of times before she understood that it was a tissue diagnosis. It wasn’t going to change if I had another biopsy sent to another lab.”

Listen to the podcast

Gowri shares what it’s like to be diagnosed with breast cancer as a young woman, working throughout treatment, participating in a clinical trial and what it’s like to be diagnosed with cancer when you are a doctor.

Working Through Breast Cancer Treatment

Gowri was in a unique situation, as she was on a working visa and wished to be treated in Australia.

“The only way I could continue my treatment is if I had a job.”

“So, I had to work in order to pay for the private insurance, and private insurance in Australia is just awesome. Because it literally paid for almost all my treatment,” she said.

“So, I didn’t stop work, but obviously I took a step back. I stopped doing on-calls because it wouldn’t have been safe anyway.”

“I still went to work, went for clinics, still went to do some surgeries. But obviously nothing major and there was always a consultant around anyways who scrubbed into theatres.”

Participating in a Clinical Trial

Gowri was asked by her oncologist if she would like to participate in a clinical trial. It was called the AbbVie clinical trial and was for women with early stage triple negative breast cancer.

“She explained to me about the trial, about the drug Veliparib, and that there was a possibility that I wouldn’t get the drug if I was on the trial, but I’d still be getting the normal chemotherapy you’d get for women who were diagnosed with this type of cancer”

“I thought that breast cancer treatments have come a long way and the only reason why it’s come a long way is because of all this and I thought if I was going to contribute anything, this would be a good way.”

She said her trust in her oncologist was a large part in her deciding to participate.

“She was active in participating in trials and I knew she was a good oncologist.”

“Because she had suggested this, I immediately said, yes, that’s fine. I’ll do it. Whatever helps and if I get the drug that’s working and if it’s going to help, that’s a good thing as well.”

Recovering from a Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Gowri said by focussing on the future, and the support of her family, friends and colleagues, she was able to get through her treatment.

“I never sat down and dwelled on things.”

“I always looked forward, even when I was reading my diagnosis and I sat there in that staircase, I just started to look forward to what I needed to do to get things done, and I never looked back.”

It’s been about four years since Gowri received her diagnosis, and while she said she has mostly recovered, she still has some symptoms.

“I still get lymphodema on and off in my arm because I’ve had the radiotherapy and axillary clearance done. It sometimes flares up and I get significant swelling.”

“I have had days that I have to take off work because of the swelling, just to rest my arm in a high position and I’m not a very compliant patient so I don’t wear my compression sleeve.”

“It’s kind of hard when you’re working in a hospital and you’re a surgeon, because you’re always scrubbing in and out of theatres and it can be a bit difficult and I can be a difficult patient as well,” she said.

“So, I do get flare ups every now and then, but I try my best to keep myself active.”

YOU CAN CHANGE LIVES LIKE GOWRI’S BY GIVING TO CLINICAL TRIALS RESEARCH

Latest Articles

navigating breast cancer and participating in the cambria-2 clinical trial
breast cancer ultrasound

Breast Cancer Ultrasound

split-banner-image

UK CLINICAL TRIALS

Breast Surgeon at Belfast City Hospital Dr Stuart McIntosh discusses open UK clinical trials & trends in research such as de-escalation.

Clinical Trials Open In The UK

International Collaboration is an important part of clinical trials research.

The Breast Cancer Trials research program includes collaboration with 15 different countries and international world-renowned clinical trials groups and researchers.

This includes researchers such as Dr Stuart McIntosh, who is a specialist breast surgeon at Belfast City Hospital and a Clinical Senior Lecturer in Surgical Oncology at Queen’s University in Belfast.

He said there are some interesting studies open in the UK, which have the potential to open in Australia and New Zealand.

“I think we have some very exciting studies in the UK.”

“There are de-escalation studies, which are about reducing treatment to try and minimise the complications or side effects that go with breast cancer treatments without compromising their effectiveness.”

“For example, we’ve got some very exciting studies coming up looking at minimally invasive treatment for small breast cancers found through the breast screening program, for example, using ultrasound or x-ray guided biopsy techniques to remove cancers.

“We also have some studies looking at omitting radiotherapy in women with very low risk cancer because of course, radiotherapy, like surgery is not without potential side effects or complications and the PRIMETIME study is looking at women with very low risk disease, can we safely omit radiotherapy from them.”

Dr McIntosh said there are also ongoing studies into multi-parameter tests.

Listen to the podcast

Breast Surgeon at Belfast City Hospital Dr Stuart McIntosh discusses clinical trials open in the UK & explains it’s hoped these trials will open in Australia & NZ.

“It’s basically a test that you do on the tumour tissue that’s been removed to see which genes are turned on, which genes are turned off.”

“They can give us an indication of risk of recurrence and then we can try to use that information to guide the use of chemotherapy in certain groups of patients” he said.

“The OPTIMA trial is looking at that in patients who have estrogen sensitive lymph node positive patients and we also have some studies in development looking at omitting surgery after neoadjuvant or pre-surgical chemotherapy to see patients who have apparently have a complete response to their treatment.”

“Is there any benefit to taking out something that’s not actually there? Probably not, but we need to prove that so the no-surgery trials in the UK are going to address that issue.”

Dr Stuart McIntosh said he believes the relationship between UK breast cancer clinical trials researchers and Breast Cancer Trials will continue to strengthen.

“In Australia and New Zealand, you have done a fantastic job collaborating on the POSNOC trial for example, looking at axillary surgery after sentinel node biopsy and there’s some great recruitment here.”

“There’s obviously great enthusiasm for clinical trials, and so yes, I hope we will be able to collaborate on some of these studies.”

Support Us

Help us to change lives through breast cancer clinical trials research

profile image

Dr Stuart McIntosh

Dr Stuart McIntosh is a specialist breast surgeon at Belfast City Hospital and a Clinical Senior Lecturer in Surgical Oncology at Queen’s University in Belfast.

Latest Articles

navigating breast cancer and participating in the cambria-2 clinical trial
breast cancer ultrasound

Breast Cancer Ultrasound

split-banner-image

RADIATION THERAPY

Radiation therapy uses doses of radiation to kill cancer cells & shrink tumors. Professor Julia White explains why it is an important part of breast cancer treatment.

What Is Radiation Therapy?

About half of Australians and New Zealanders diagnosed with cancer each year may benefit from radiation therapy.

Radiation therapy, also called radiotherapy, uses radiation, such as high-energy x-rays, gamma rays, electron beams or protons, to kill or damage cancer cells and stop them from growing, in a way which spares the normal tissue around the cancer.

Professor Julia White is a tenured Professor of Radiation Oncology and Koltz Sisters Chair for Cancer Research at The Ohio State University.
She explained that radiation is an important part of breast cancer treatment for most patients.

“In breast cancer treatment, it’s used for every stage of breast cancer,” she said.

“In early stage breast cancer, the main focus of radiation is to help women keep their breasts.”

“We know the addition of radiation following a breast conserving surgery or a lumpectomy is really what makes the treatment equivalent of removing the breast.”

“In more locally advanced breast cancer, when the cancer has spread to the lymph nodes, it’s a barometer or a sign, that the cancer is at risk of spreading to the blood stream and causing distant metastases.”

“So, in node positive, armpit node positive breast cancer, we’re able to use radiation to treat the lymph nodes and reduce the chance of that cancer spreading through distant metastases.”

“And then the last way we use radiation, is when breast cancer is incurable, it’s metastatic, and patients and women are having pain or disrupting their lives with function problem because of pain, radiation can be used to help reduce the symptoms and improve quality of life in women with metastatic breast cancer.”

Listen To The Podcast

Professor Julia White explains why it is an important part of breast cancer treatment.

How Much Radiation Is Given?

Professor White explained patient safety is the priority when deciding what dose of radiation should be given.

“To make radiation safe we have to divide the dose of radiation we want to give into many doses that are delivered Monday through Friday – five days a week and that allows the normal tissue surrounding the cancer to heal appropriately.”

“So, most radiation gets delivered for breast conserving therapy to help women keep their breasts. If they have early stage breast cancer it’s done in about three to four weeks, Monday through Friday. So, typically somewhere between 15 and 21 treatments is what’s used regularly.”

“When we treat the lymph nodes, that’s typically between 15 to 25 treatments Monday through Friday, five days per week.”

Professor White’s experience is in predominately in the United States and she said these doses can differ worldwide.

She said women will typically receive between three to five weeks of radiation. However, she said, it’s not as daunting as it sounds.

“That sounds miserable right. Five weeks of radiation.”

“You’re in the radiation centre for about an hour a day at most, and you’re on the radiation treatment table on average for about 20 minutes, the on time for the actual radiation machine is only between 8 and 12 minutes typically and you won’t feel anything, you won’t see anything, you hear the machine kind of click on and click off during the treatment.”

Side Effects Of Radiation Therapy

Professor White said most patients will suffer side effects from this treatment.

“Nearly every patient who goes through radiation therapy, either for breast conservation or because her lymph nodes have cancer cells in them, have symptoms from the radiation.”

Professor White said the skin is what takes the brunt of the radiation.

“By the end of radiation nearly 100% of patients will have some skin discoloration; usually redness of the skin or tanning the skin, the skin darkens and that can be really managed regularly early intervention with moisturisers, emollients and anti-itch creams to help keep patients safe.”

She said most women can manage these side effects through topical agents and over the counter medicines. However, there are treatments that can be prescribed from your treating physician if symptoms persist.

Research Into Radiation Therapy

Although radiation therapy is an established treatment in breast cancer, there is continuing research into how best to personalise the treatment.

“I think the goal of radiation oncology clinical trials in breast cancer is to figure out what radiation therapy strategy best fits the cancer and the patients individually.”

Now that we understand so much more about the biology of breast cancer, we think we can identify women who can have successful breast conservation with just having surgery.”

“Now that won’t be everyone, but there is a subset of patients out there.”

“For example, luminal breast cancers which are characterised by being hormone sensitive and particularly women who are dedicated to taking their endocrine treatment, we can identify biologically some that can be done with breast conservation after surgery.”

Another area of research is into how best to reduce the number of treatments for suitable patients.

“There is partial breast irradiation, which can be done somewhere between five and eight days of radiation and that reduces the burden of treatment.”

“What characterises all our clinical trials are trying to fit whatever the stage of cancer is and the needs of the patient, trying to make sure we have a strategy for radiation, that either means back off a little bit or enhances or intensifying a little bit, figuring that out is, I think, is where the goal of our radiation is right now.”

Breast Cancer Trials currently has one clinical trial investigating if some women with early breast cancer can avoid radiation therapy.

The EXPERT trial uses a genomic test of breast cancer tissue to identify which patients are suitable.

You can learn more about our open clinical trials here.

QUICK ACCESS

profile image

Professor Julia White

Professor Julia White is a tenured Professor of Radiation Oncology and Koltz Sisters Chair for Cancer Research at The Ohio State University.

Support Us

Help us to change lives through breast cancer clinical trials research

Latest Articles

navigating breast cancer and participating in the cambria-2 clinical trial
breast cancer ultrasound

Breast Cancer Ultrasound

split-banner-image

HER2-POSITIVE EARLY STAGE BREAST CANCER

HER2-positive early stage breast cancer molecular biomarkers are a research area for Associate Professor Aleix Prat.

Cancer Biomarkers In HER2+ Early Breast Cancer

One of the best ways to diagnose breast cancer early, aid in treatment decisions or predict treatment response is to use cancer biomarkers.

A biomarker is a substance in a person’s blood, urine or other body fluids. It can also be found in or on the tumour, that is produced by the cancer tissue itself or by other cells in the body in response to cancer.

Researchers use biomarkers to provide insights into a patients’ individual cancer.

HER2 positive early breast cancer molecular biomarkers are a research area for Associate Professor Aleix Prat.

Associate Professor Prat is the Head of Medical Oncology at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona in Spain and was an international guest speaker at the latest Breast Cancer Trials Annual Scientific Meeting.

Associate Professor Prat said investigating HER2 positive early breast cancer is important as it can become an aggressive disease if left untreated.
“HER2 positive disease represents around 20% of all breast cancers.”

“One out of five women develop this type of disease,” he said.

“We know that we are, on one hand, over-treating some patients, and on the other hand, we are under treating some patients.”
“So, we need biomarkers.”

He said researchers are working on ways to identify the different groups of patients within HER2 positive disease.

“Today we have several tests, several biomarkers, that are starting to subdivide this group of patients.”

One example of this is molecular sub-types.

“This is a biomarker of 50 genes that help us to divide HER2 positive disease into four different groups,” said Associate Professor Prat.

“Today, we have substantial evidence that these different groups behave differently and respond differently to the standard of care.”

“In particular, there is one group of patients with this biomarker, that seem to benefit a lot from drugs that target the HER2. So, this is the group of patients that potentially in the future, if we do the right clinical trials, we might be able to get rid of chemotherapy.”

However more clinical studies need to be conducted before this can become standard practice.

Listen to the podcast

HER2 positive early breast cancer molecular biomarkers are a research area for Associate Professor Aleix Prat. Find out more about A/Professor Prat’s research on this BCT podcast.

Immunotherapy In Breast Cancer

Another biomarker is the immune system according to Associate Professor Prat.

“We know that there is a substantial proportion of patients that have HER2 positive tumours, and these tumours are inflamed, they have a lot of cells that come from our own immune system, that are there, detecting the cancer and are trying to fight.”

“They are not winning, because if they win, there’s no cancer.”

“So that population of patients have a better survival. So, potentially this bio-marker could help us to de-escalate therapy because they have a better outcome.”

“At the same time, these are a group of patients that either they don’t respond as we want, therefore immunotherapy in the future could be a strategy to pursue.”

Immunotherapy is an expanding field in breast cancer research. Breast Cancer Trials currently has two immunotherapy clinical trials open – CHARIOT and DIAmOND.

HER2 Positive Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

Associate Professor Prat said thanks to tumour samples, they have been able to design a clinical trial to de-escalate chemotherapy treatment for patients with HER2 positive disease with specific molecular subtypes.

He said they can potentially treat these patients with three months of one chemotherapy treatment together with anti-bodies against HER2 disease, instead of six months of chemotherapy.

Another area of de-escalation is in breast cancer surgery.

“We are about to open a study in Barcelona, at my centre,” said Associate Professor Prat.

“It’s a pilot study because we want to go slowly into that direction, where we will select patients with HER2 positive and with a particular biomarker, the molecular subtype and show that if we treat them with standard therapy and if they have an excellent response by MRI and biopsy, we are not going to perform surgery.”

“This is going to be a study of only 18 patients but it’s just a way to start opening that door, which is to de-escalate surgery.”

He said there is a similar trial currently being run in the US in HER2 positive, triple negative disease.

“This is a multicentre trial that, if they achieve a response with MRI and a biopsy, they don’t undergo surgery. So, there’s already some trials going in that direction. So, I think it’s worth keeping an eye on those, and those results.”

Support Us

Help us to change lives through breast cancer clinical trials research

profile image

Associate Professor Aleix Prat

Associate Professor Aleix Prat is the Head of Medical Oncology at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona in Spain

Latest Articles

navigating breast cancer and participating in the cambria-2 clinical trial
breast cancer ultrasound

Breast Cancer Ultrasound

split-banner-image

FINANCIAL AND EMPLOYMENT IMPACT OF BREAST CANCER

BCNA surveyed 2,000 members who have received a breast cancer diagnosis about the out-of-pocket costs of breast cancer treatment & care. BCNA’s CEO Kirsten Pillatti takes us through the results of this survey.

The Impact Of A Breast Cancer Diagnosis

A breast cancer diagnosis can have a huge financial impact on women and men, and their families.

The diagnosis often comes as a shock and many are financial unprepared and unaware of how much out-of-pocket costs come with treatment.

Breast Cancer Network Australia (BCNA) surveyed 2,000 of its members who have received a breast cancer diagnosis, about the out-of-pocket costs of their breast cancer treatment and care, and other associated costs faced in the first five years after a breast cancer diagnosis.

Listen to the podcast

BCNA surveyed 2,000 members who have received a breast cancer diagnosis about the out-of-pocket costs of breast cancer treatment & care. BCNA’s CEO Kirsten Pillati takes us through the results of this survey on the BCT Podcast.

Public or Private Health

BCNA CEO Kirsten Pillatti said they found a huge range of costs for treatment and care across the private and public health system.

“We know that from the survey that 12% had no costs from their breast cancer experience which is great.”

“But we know that even if people make a choice to go public that there are out of pocket costs.”

“I think really what the research highlighted was that there was a big range and there is often a shock value to that range and so anywhere from 25% of the 2,000 had out of pocket costs of more $21,000 and those who were in private had an average of $17,500 out of pocket.”

She said previous research found through their State of the Nation reports found that many people were un-informed about the costs associated with public and private care.

“What we heard was that at the point of being told you had breast cancer, either through BreastScreen or your GP, the only question you’re asked is ‘Do you have private health insurance?’”

“I think for many people who have been paying private health insurance for years and now have been diagnosed, they think it’s going to help them be fast tracked through the system and help with a lot of your anxiety,” said Ms Pillatti.

“But actually, what people don’t realise is just how many things have out of pocket costs and how many things are not covered by your private health insurance.”

“The biggest shock of all, being that radiotherapy in breast cancer is not covered by your private health insurer and I think there is an absolute lack of clarity from clinicians to patients around that.”

How Location Impacts Treatment Options

Another discovery of the report was how location can affect treatment options and employment impact.

“In metro areas, 50% of households had a loss of household hours. But if you look regional areas, 70% had a significant loss of household hours.”

“We also found in rural areas their out of pocket costs were the same but actually they were having less treatment options,” said Ms Pillatti.

“So, many people were choosing not to have reconstruction, not to have radiotherapy and really, sadly, not to have some of the follow up tests that are required just because they simply can’t afford it.”

She said the fall-out from this can have a significant impact on the patient’s future health.

“84% of our members report the thing they most fear about is that their breast cancer will return or will, if they’re a metastatic patient, progress.”

“When people are forced to either pay for their electricity or pay for a scan that month,then electricity is going to win, and this is one of the real fundamental problems of the financial toxicity that we have.”

Ms Pillatti encourages anyone who is struggling financially during their breast cancer experience should contact Centrelink, The Cancer Council or BCNA for assistance.

You can read the full Financial Impacts of Breast Cancer in Australia report here.

Support Us

Help us to change lives through breast cancer clinical trials research

profile image

Ms Kirsten Pillatti

Ms Kirsten Pillatti is the CEO of Breast Cancer Network Australia (BCNA)

Latest Articles

navigating breast cancer and participating in the cambria-2 clinical trial
breast cancer ultrasound

Breast Cancer Ultrasound

split-banner-image

SIMILARITIES OF PROSTATE AND BREAST CANCER

The main commonality is that breast and prostate cancers are both hormone dependent cancers. These commonalities mean similar strategies are used to target both diseases.

The Commonalities In Breast And Prostate Cancer

Professor Wayne Tilley has spent his career looking at the commonalities in both breast and prostate cancer.

He is the Director of the Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories at the University of Adelaide and South Australia and was a guest speaker at the 2019 Breast Cancer Trials Annual Scientific Meeting.

Professor Tilley is renowned for leveraging the commonalities of these two cancers to advance knowledge and treatments for both disease types.

“The main commonality is that breast and prostate cancers are both hormone dependent cancers,” said Professor Tilley.

“In the case of prostate, it requires testicular androgens for its growth, at least in all the initial stages, and the same with breast cancer.”

Androgens are hormones, such as testosterone, which are important for normal male sexual development before birth and during puberty. Men and women have androgens and estrogen.

“Some 70-80% of breast cancers are driven by the estrogen receptor which actually requires the ovarian hormone estrogen,” said Professor Tilley.

Listen to the podcast

Listen to our conversation with Professor Wayne Tilley a specialist in breast & prostate cancer. He is renowned for leveraging commonalities of both to advance knowledge & treatments.

How These Similarities Can Help Develop Targeted Treatments

These commonalities mean similar strategies are used to target both diseases.

“So, drugs that actually target the androgen receptor in prostate cancer to inhibit its action are similar to drugs such as tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitors or newer drugs that will actually degrade the estrogen receptor protein, are used to treat endocrine sensitive breast cancer.”

Professor Tilley said they have learnt that both cancers are able to change the requirements for tumour growth.

“Even though it’s the androgen receptor in prostate that’s the main driver and estrogen receptor in breast, they both actually mutate or acquire altered structure and therefore altered function.”

“So, we’ve been able to model how these changes occur and realise if we’re smart and looking at how prostate cancer adapts to a new drug, we might be able to predict something similar in the case of breast cancer,” said Professor Tilley.

“For example, we reported mutations with resistance to treatment in prostate cancer back in the mid-1990s, but it’s taken to this current era in time for people to have realised that similar mutations in the estrogen receptor also cause resistance to current therapies.”

“So, if we’ve been smart, we’d probably could have understood that in breast cancer 20 years ago. It’s just that people tend to work in their own little silos, their own little areas, without trying to understand how changes in another system might inform your own.”

He said he became interested in studying both cancer types to help find these commonalities to further advanced treatments.

He said his research is into how estrogen and androgens work in both men and women.

“What we realised a number of years ago, is this estrogen/androgen balance in women is important, both in normal mammary gland development and in controlling the growth of the breast tumour cell.”

“So, what we actually think based on a number of our studies in women is the androgen receptor is a good player and it acts as a break to constrain the action of the estrogen receptor and if that break was released then the cancers would be more aggressive.”

“But conversely, if we can activate that break, it affords a new opportunity to control estrogen receptor driven growths.”

“So now, with a number of collaborators around the world, we’ve been able to develop new models and test clinically how you could activate this androgen receptor as a potential therapeutic strategy for patients whose tumors have failed with conventional hormone therapies.

“If you can use these drugs, because they actually have many beneficial effects in women, they actually improve bone density and in some cases libido. If we could actually take them back even earlier could we actually prevent the development of endocrine resistance or even could they be used in a prevention setting?”

“So, we’re looking at quite a broad spectrum now of how you might use activation of the androgen receptor in women with breast cancer.”

Support Us

Help us to change lives through breast cancer clinical trials research

profile image

Professor Wayne Tilley

Professor Wayne Tilley is the Director of the Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories at the University of Adelaide and South Australia.

Latest Articles

navigating breast cancer and participating in the cambria-2 clinical trial
breast cancer ultrasound

Breast Cancer Ultrasound

split-banner-image

BREAST CANCER SURVIVAL DATA EXPLAINED

The breast cancer survival rate is a way of measuring how many people are alive at a certain time after a diagnosis. This overall number changes dramatically depending on what stage of breast cancer you are diagnosed with.

Why Do We Measure Breast Cancer Survival?

The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare keeps track of survival rates for all cancers in Australia. The survival rate is a way of measuring how many people are alive at a certain time after a diagnosis.

For example, an 85% survival rate at five years means that five years after the diagnosis of breast cancer, 85% (or 85 out of every 100) patients are alive. It is a common way of understanding and comparing the outcomes for people with a range of different health conditions.

The chance of surviving breast cancer five years from diagnosis has increased from 73% to 91% in the last 20 years in Australia, thanks in large part to clinical trials research. The uptake in breast cancer screening has also contributed to this increase, with screening allowing for breast cancers to be found earlier.

But this overall number changes dramatically depending on what stage of breast cancer you are diagnosed with.

The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare has released its latest data on five-year survival rates.

It shows that those diagnosed with stage one breast cancer have a 100% five-year survival rate whereas those diagnosed at stage four have a 32% five-year survival rate.

Why Is There A Difference In Survival Rates?

There are a number of reasons why the survival rate decreases from stage one to stage four. When breast cancer metastasises, or reaches stage four, it has spread beyond the breast to other organs in the body which makes it more difficult to treat. In some cases, this is because it has already been exposed to therapeutic drugs and has acquired a resistance to them.

What is metastatic breast cancer?

The data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) shows that age had little impact upon survival rates for early breast cancer.

Females diagnosed with early stage (stage one and two) breast cancer had similar survival rates across all ages. However, females diagnosed with advanced cancer had lower survival with increasing age.

The data also showed that your postcode has little impact upon your survival, with survivors generally similar by remoteness and socioeconomic status area.

How Is Breast Cancer Trials Research Helping to Improve Survival Rates?

Breast Cancer Trials is actively working to increase survival rates across all breast cancers.

Breast Cancer Trials currently has two clinical trials open to patients with early breast cancer; EXPERT and OPTIMA, three clinical trials open to those with metastatic breast cancer; FINER, and CAPTURE, and one clinical trial open for the prevention of breast cancer; BRCA-P.

 

Support Us

Help us to change lives through breast cancer clinical trials research

Latest Articles

navigating breast cancer and participating in the cambria-2 clinical trial
breast cancer ultrasound

Breast Cancer Ultrasound

split-banner-image

THE BIG 1-98
CLINICAL TRIAL

The BIG 1-98 breast cancer clinical trial was a pivotal clinical trial which helped to stop breast cancer returning and improved survival rates for some women.

What Is The BIG 1-98 Clinical Trial?

If you’re a post-menopausal woman with early breast cancer, you may have been treated with an aromatase inhibitor.

This was proven to be the most effective treatment for endocrine responsive early breast cancer through the BIG 1-98 clinical trial.

Clinical trials are designed to find out if new treatments or prevention strategies are more effective than those currently accepted as the best available standard treatment.

Chair of the Breast Cancer Trials Scientific Advisory Committee, Associate Professor Prue Francis said the BIG 1-98 clinical trial helped to stop breast cancer returning and improved survival rates for some women.

“BIG 1-98 was a pivotal trial.”

“It was studying post-menopausal women with early breast cancer that was hormone receptor positive, so estrogen receptor positive.”

“The standard hormonal therapy at the time, for these women, was to take tamoxifen for five years” said Associate Professor Francis.

“The BIG 1-98 trial was comparing an aromatase inhibitor called Letrozole for five years to tamoxifen for five years, with the hypothesis that Letrozole might be more effective.”

“It was also comparing two other strategies which was to give in the first couple of years, Letrozole and the remaining three years with tamoxifen or vice versa, and the first couple of years with tamoxifen and then switching to the Letrozole.”

“So, it had four different ways of delivering the oral hormones.”

The early results of the clinical trial indicated that Letrozole was the more effective treatment compared with Tamoxifen for women with post-menopausal estrogen receptor positive breast cancer.

“But that’s not to say that every post-menopausal women with breast cancer needs an aromatase inhibitor because there are some women that have relatively good prognosis in their post-menopausal breast cancer who would probably do equally well in terms of their long-term cure rate regardless of whether they got tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor like Letrozole” said Associate Professor Francis.

“But for women who have a higher risk situation, the difference between a more effective therapy like Letrozole than tamoxifen could be really quite important.”

Listen to the podcast

The BIG 1-98 breast cancer clinical trial was a pivotal clinical trial which helped to stop breast cancer returning and improved survival rates for some women. Professor Prue Francis discuses this important clinical trial.

How BIG 1-98 Changed Practice

Combined with another clinical trial, the ATTACK trial which studied anastrozole, the BIG 1-98 clinical trial was pivotal in shifting the standard of care for post-menopausal women with early hormone receptor breast cancer. It is now more common for women with this type of breast cancer to be treated with an aromatase inhibitor hormone therapy than tamoxifen.

It has been a decade since the Big 1-98 clinical trial, with ten year follow up results being published this year.

However, these results are complicated as there was a cross-over that occurred in the trial, after the early results were released which showed the aromatase inhibitor appeared to be more effective.

“When those early results became available, those running the trial then recommended that the women who were randomised in the trial to receive the five years of standard therapy with tamoxifen should have the option to cross over to Letrozole, which was being shown to be a more effective option” said Associate Professor Francis.

“So, the long-term results of the trial became more complicated because there wasn’t a direct comparison of five years of Letrozole to five years of tamoxifen.”

“When we conduct clinical trials, there is monitoring of the trial by independent committees as well as the trial committee to try and look at whether the ongoing treatments of the trial are still appropriate to continue studying.”

“Along the way it was deemed that there was enough information to notify the doctors and women participating in the trial that it should be an option for the people in the control group to no longer remain on their control treatment tamoxifen, should they wish to switch.”

The HERA Clinical Trial

This cross-over has occurred before in the Breast Cancer Trials HERA clinical trial.

“The HERA trial that the group participated in which was one of the pivotal trials that showed that adjuvant Trastuzumab, sometimes referred to as Herceptin, could improve survival and reduce relapse rates in HER2 positive early breast cancer.”

“There were women in the HERA trial who were in the control group and in that trial, the control group was your standard chemotherapy and hormone therapy with no Trastuzumab, no Herceptin, and those women were subsequentially offered a cross over and if they wished to receive Herceptin.”

“But it does make the long term follow up results of trials complex if there’s been a cross over because potentially it can dilute the improvement that might have been seen otherwise.”

“But one of the things with Breast Cancer Trials is they often have a very long natural history, so we will typically be following women usually for at least ten years and sometimes longer. So sometimes there is newer information that might become available either from the trial itself or from other trials that sometimes requires a change in what is considered appropriate for the control group.”

Support Us

Help us to change lives through breast cancer clinical trials research

profile image

Professor Prue Francis

Professor Prue Francis is a Breast Cancer Trials researcher and Clinical Head of Breast Medical Oncology at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

Latest Articles

navigating breast cancer and participating in the cambria-2 clinical trial
breast cancer ultrasound

Breast Cancer Ultrasound

split-banner-image

TYPES OF BREAST CANCER

Breast cancer is not just one disease, but several. There are a number of different breast cancer subtypes and treatments are becoming increasingly personalised for patients.

Breast Cancer Types

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Australia. It occurs when abnormal or damaged cells grow in an uncontrolled manner and a tumour is formed. Breast cancer can occur in both women and men, although it is less common for it to occur in men. In Australia the risk of being diagnosed with breast cancer by age 85 is 1 in 7 for women and 1 in 675 for men.

Breast cancer is not just one disease, but several. There are a number of different breast cancer subtypes and treatments are becoming increasingly personalised for patients.

You can learn about the signs and symptoms of breast cancer here.

You can learn about breast cancer prevention and how to reduce your risk of breast cancer here.

Non-Invasive Breast Conditions

  • Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

    Ductal carcinoma in situ or DCIS is a non-invasive breast condition which affects around 1,200 women a year in Australia. DCIS is the name for abnormal changes in the cells in the milk ducts of the breast.
     
    Although these abnormal changes have the potential to turn into invasive cancer cells, it is not breast cancer as we more commonly understand it. A woman cannot die from DCIS as the abnormal cells are contained within the milk ducts.
     
    DCIS cannot usually be felt but is found on a mammogram or ultrasound. If not treated it can develop into a more serious, invasive breast cancer. Treatment of DCIS usually involves breast surgery and radiotherapy, and occasionally includes surgery to remove lymph nodes and hormonal therapies.
  • Lobular Carcinoma In Situ

    Lobular carcinoma in situ or LCIS is a non-invasive breast condition. LCIS is the name for abnormal cells that are contained to the lobules (milk glands) of the breast.

    Like DCIS, although these abnormal changes can turn into invasive cancer cells, it is not breast cancer as we more commonly understand it. A woman cannot die from LCIS as the cells are contained to the lobules of the breast.

    LCIS cannot usually be felt but is found in a mammogram or when a biopsy is taken for another reason. LCIS does not require treatment if there are no other abnormal changes to the breast. However, a woman with LCIS should be carefully monitored as having LCIS increases the chance of developing breast cancer in future.

Invasive Breast Cancers – Histological Subtypes

  • Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

    Invasive ductal carcinoma is a broad term used to classify cancer that began growing in a milk duct and has invaded the fibrous or fatty tissue of the breast outside the duct. Invasive ductal carcinoma accounts for around 80 per cent of all breast cancers diagnosed.

  • Invasive Lobular Carcinoma

    Invasive lobular carcinoma the other major histological subtype: a breast cancer that begins in the lobules (milk glands) of the breast, and has spread beyond the lobule, potentially spreading to the lymph nodes and other parts of the body. Typically, invasive lobular carcinoma tumors are associated with a good prognosis, being low grade and oestrogen receptor positive. However, the tumour can be highly metastatic.

  • Paget’s Disease Of The Nipple

    Paget’s disease of the nipple is a rare form of breast cancer that affects the nipple and the area around the nipple (the areola). It is commonly associated with an invasive cancer elsewhere in the breast. Around two of every 100 cases of breast cancer involve Paget’s disease of the nipple.

    The main sign of Paget’s disease of the nipple is a change in the nipple and/or areola. Treatment can include breast surgery and radiotherapy.

  • Inflammatory Breast Cancer

    Inflammatory breast cancer is a rare form of breast cancer that affects the lymphatic vessels in the skin of the breast. This type of breast cancer does not present as a lump but rather a redness or rash in appearance, as a result of the lymphatic vessels becoming blocked and the breast becomes red and swollen, similar to an infection. Most women with inflammatory breast cancer will have a combination of treatments that can include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonal therapies and targeted therapies.

Invasive Breast Cancers – Treatment Targets

  • HER2 Positive Breast Cancer

    HER2 positive breast cancer is any type of breast cancer that tests positive for a protein called human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). HER2 positive breast cancer is a more aggressive form of breast cancer compared with HER2 negative disease.

    HER2 positive breast cancer is treated using a HER2 targeted therapy. The most common HER2 positive targeted therapy available in Australia and New Zealand is trastuzumab (Herceptin). Herceptin was found to significantly reduce breast cancer returning, as reported in the Breast Cancer Trials HERA clinical trial.

    For women with HER2 positive early breast cancer, the current recommendation is to give trastuzumab at the same time as chemotherapy, either before or after breast cancer surgery.

    For women with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer, trastuzumab may be given on its own or with other treatments and will continue so long as the benefit to the patient outweighs the side effects.

  • Triple Negative Breast Cancer

    Triple negative breast cancer is breast cancer that tests negative for all three receptors – oestrogen, progesterone and HER2. Triple negative breast cancer is a more aggressive cancer that usually occurs at an earlier age. It has a greater chance of developing into a metastatic stage and has poorer clinical outcomes as shown by higher relapse rates and lower survival rates.

    Standard treatment of triple negative breast cancer typically consists of surgery, chemotherapy and usually a course of radiotherapy. Often chemotherapy treatment is given prior to breast surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) as it is effective in reducing the size of the breast cancer while providing useful information about the effectiveness of the treatment being given.

    You can learn more about triple negative breast cancer here.

Breast Cancer Stages

  • Early Breast Cancer

    Early breast cancer is an invasive breast cancer that is contained in the breast and may or may not have spread to lymph nodes in the breast or armpit. The aim of treatment for early breast cancer is to remove the breast cancer and any cancer cells that may be left in the breast, armpit or other parts of the body but cannot be detected. Treatment can involve radiotherapy, breast surgery, chemotherapy, hormonal therapies and targeted therapies.

  • Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

    Locally advanced breast cancer is an invasive breast cancer that is large or has spread to areas near the breast, such as the chest wall. However, there are no signs the cancer has spread beyond the breast region or to other parts of the body.

    Signs of locally advanced breast cancer can include a lump in the breast or armpit that doesn’t move freely but feels attached to the chest wall, a lump at the base of the neck, ulcers on the breast, dimpled skin that looks like an orange peel or a large red, swollen breast. Treatment for locally advanced breast cancer will usually involve a combination of breast surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapies or hormonal therapies.

  • Metastatic Breast Cancer

    Metastatic breast cancer, also known as advanced, secondary or stage four breast cancer, is breast cancer which has spread to other parts of the body such as the bones, liver or lungs. Many people who are diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer have been diagnosed with breast cancer before. However, for some it can be the first diagnosis of breast cancer.

    Metastatic breast cancer occurs when cancer cells break away from the cancer in the breast and move via blood vessels or lymphatic vessels and form a new cancer growth in other parts of the body.

    Every metastatic breast cancer diagnosis is different and will therefore require different treatments. Despite the cancer growths being in other organs such as the lung, it is still called ‘breast cancer’ and is treated as breast cancer. The aim of treating metastatic breast cancer is to control the growth and spread of the cancer, to relieve symptoms and improve or maintain quality of life. Treatment options will depend on what is most likely to control the cancer and what side effects the patient can cope with. Treatment for metastatic breast cancer can include hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy and surgery.

If you have any concerns regarding your treatment or diagnosis, speak with you treating physician.

You can learn more about open Breast Cancer Trials clinical trials here.

Latest Articles

navigating breast cancer and participating in the cambria-2 clinical trial
breast cancer ultrasound

Breast Cancer Ultrasound

split-banner-image

TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER: SYMPTOMS, TREATMENT & PREVENTION

Triple negative breast cancer accounts for 15% of all breast cancers. This type of breast cancer does not have the three most common types of receptors known to make most breast cancers grow.

What Is Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)?

Triple negative breast cancer is a type of breast cancer that does not have the three most common type of receptors known to make most breast cancers grow – oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2). Triple negative breast cancer accounts for approximately 15% of all breast cancers.

Triple negative breast cancer is a more aggressive cancer that usually occurs at an earlier age. It has a greater chance of developing into a metastatic stage and has poorer clinical outcomes as shown by higher relapse rates and lower survival rates. Because it does not have receptors that can be targeted by medications such as hormone- and HER2-blocking drugs, it has fewer treatment options available.

On this page, we’ll look at some of the symptoms of triple negative breast cancer, as well as treatment and prevention options.

What Are The Symptoms Of Triple Negative Breast Cancer?

The symptoms of TNBC are the same as any other type of breast cancer. Symptoms can include:

  • New lump in the breast, armpit area or around the collarbone
  • Change in breast size or shape
  • Changes to the nipple, such as sores or crusting, an ulcer or inverted nipple
  • Clear or bloody nipple discharge
  • Changes to the skin including redness, puckering or dimpling (an ‘orange peel’ appearance)
  • Breast tenderness or pain

Learn more about the symptoms of breast cancer.

Who Is At Risk Of Developing Triple Negative Breast Cancer?

No one has a definitive answer on what causes breast cancer. Anyone can be diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer and should be aware of their own personal risk factors. You can use the online iPrevent tool to better understand your breast cancer risk and act on it.

There are a number of known risk factors for triple negative breast cancer including:

  • BRCA Mutations – A BRCA1 gene mutation is associated with a higher risk of triple negative breast cancer. However, most triple negative breast cancers are not caused by a BRCA gene mutation. If you have a strong family history of breast cancer, you may wish to consider genetic testing. This is something to discuss with your doctor.
  • Pre-Menopausal Women – While the average age of first being diagnosed with breast cancer in Australia is 61, triple negative breast cancer occurs more often in patients who are pre-menopausal or under 50 years of age. The cause of triple negative breast cancer in this young age group is not yet completely known. However, it could be due to breasts of younger women in their childbearing and breastfeeding years is of a different composition to the breast of an older women who has been menopausal for a long time.
  • African American and African Women – Triple negative breast cancer is more likely to be diagnosed in African American and African women compared with white or Hispanic women. This is thought to be due to genes or mutations that pre-dispose this group of women, particularly pre-menopausal women, to triple negative breast cancer.

Treatment Of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Standard treatment of early stage triple negative breast cancer (stage 1 and stage 2) typically includes the following:

  • Surgery
  • Chemotherapy
  • Usually a course of radiotherapy

Often chemotherapy treatment is given prior to breast surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), as it can effectively reduce the size of the breast cancer while providing useful information about the effectiveness of the treatment being given.

Prevention of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

For those who have the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation, there are important considerations for the prevention of breast cancer. Women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations have an approximate 70% risk of developing breast cancer and up to 40% risk of developing ovarian cancer over their lifetimes.

There are preventative strategies for those with this genetic mutations which include protective surgery via the removal of both healthy breasts and hormonal therapy medicines such as tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. Removal of the ovaries and fallopian tubes helps reduce the risk of both ovarian and breast cancer. The breast cancer benefit is due to a reduction in the levels of oestrogen in the body.

There is no definitive way to prevent breast cancer, however there are a number of risk factors that you can manage to reduce the likelihood of future breast cancer. This includes maintaining a healthy body weight, not smoking and engaging in regular exercise. You can read about breast cancer prevention and how to reduce your risk here.

In one of our recent free online Q&A’s moderated by Author and Journalist, Annabel Crabb, our panel of experts discussed Triple Negative Breast Cancer, including the latest in research, treatments and genetics relating to this disease. If you missed out on this Q&A, you can access the recording below.

What is the Survival Rate of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Whilst there are no statistics on the specific survival rates for triple negative breast cancer, the relative 5-year survival rate for breast cancer is 92%. This means that those who have breast cancer are, on average, 92% as likely as those who don’t have the disease to live for at least 5 years after their diagnosis.

The survival rate is an estimate across the population, and an individual’s chance of survival is dependent on their specific characteristics and the nature of the tumour, such as the stage of the breast cancer at diagnosis, the age, gender and the subtype of the breast cancer (ER+, HER2+ or triple negative breast cancer).

The 5-year survival rate for Stage 1 (early) breast cancer is, on average, 100% and Stage 2 is 95%. For locally advanced cancers (known as Stage 3) the survival rate is 81%, while the 5-year survival rate for Stage 4 (metastatic breast cancer) is significantly lower at 32%.

Clinical Trials Research on Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Primary results of the CHARIOT clinical trial were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) international conference in 2022. This was a world-first Australian clinical trial developed by Breast Cancer Trials (BCT) researchers that was open to both women and men diagnosed with triple negative early breast cancer. The trial recruited 34 patients at eight participating institutions throughout Australia.

The purpose of the CHARIOT clinical trial was to see if using two immunotherapy drugs (nivolumab and ipilimumab) together with standard chemotherapy (paclitaxel) before surgery, was safe and effective and could stimulate the body’s immune system to kill the cancer cells. And, if continuing treatment with one of these drugs (nivolumab) after surgery can keep the immune system active to eradicate any residual cancer cells.

The trial found that in patients with early-stage triple negative breast cancer who did not respond to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the addition of nivolumab and ipilimumab resulted in a promising response rate with 24% of participants achieving a complete disappearance of their cancer within the breast and lymph nodes by the time of surgery. This treatment was able to be delivered safely, with some patients experiencing known and expected side effects of immunotherapy. These side effects were able to be successfully treated.

Professor Sherene Loi is the Study Chair of the CHARIOT clinical trial, Board Director at BCT and Head of the Translational Breast Cancer Genomics and Therapeutics Laboratory at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre. She says longer term follow up is needed to help determine the overall effectiveness of this treatment approach and the benefits to patients.

The Neo-N clinical trial aims to identify more effective treatment options for early stage triple negative breast cancer patients, by combining an immunotherapy drug (nivolumab) together with chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) prior to surgery. 

Often cancers can avoid detection and attached from the body’s immune system. This study will help us understand if nivolumab given for a short period on its own, before commencing treatment with chemotherapy, can effectively activate the body’s anti-cancer immune response and contribute to better outcomes for triple negative breast cancer patients. Patients who respond well to this treatment may be able to avoid the short and -long-term effects of anthracycline-based chemotherapy that would often be used for this type of breast cancer.

Results from Neo-N were announced at the end of 2023 and more information about this trial is available in this video.

If you would like to support the life-saving research program of Breast Cancer Trials by making a donation, click here.

Your donation will help us to conduct research into triple negative breast cancer, like the studies described above, and provide more treatment options to patients.

Long-Term Triple Negative Breast Cancer Survivors

Diane Barker was diagnosed with locally advanced triple negative breast cancer in December 2020, at just 44 years of age.

“I do remember feeling incredibly tired, like more tired than I had ever felt in my entire life. And yes, I’ve got a busy job, but I just thought maybe something was going on. And actually, my GP and I were about to start a process of, you know, a sleep clinic and doing a sleep study to see what was happening,” Diane said.

“But I was also, going through a process of having regular mammograms and ultrasounds, because my mum had had breast cancer when she was 59. So, when I turned 40, my GP said we should start doing this for you. So, I’d been doing that for a few years, and everything was fine.”

“I went to my regular scan and that process with the mammogram and the ultrasound and some red flags started appearing. I thought that maybe something might be going on when the technician called the radiographer into the room to have a look herself and I could just see the look of concern that she couldn’t entirely mask on her face. I had to go back for a biopsy, which is when I started to really think that maybe something serious was going on.”

“Then when I got the result from my GP, I was in the middle of a meeting at work and she said, I’m afraid it’s cancer. That was when everything changed for me. It was quite shocking. I was preparing myself for that news, but really nothing can prepare you for news like that. It’s devastating. It’s absolutely devastating.”

Learn more about Diane’s story here.

Early Detection is Key to Treating TNBC

Triple negative breast cancer tends to be a more aggressive disease than some other breast cancers which means it grows faster, and has fewer effective treatment options. Triple negative breast cancer is also more likely to recur within two to three years of diagnosis, as opposed to 10 to 15 years for those with oestrogen receptor – positive breast cancer. Early detection is therefore vital. If you have a strong family history, you should consider discussing your prevention and testing options with your doctor.

Breast Cancer Trials is a unique collaboration of researchers, trial participants and YOU, our valued supporters working together to save and improve the lives of every person affected by breast cancer. Help find the newest breakthrough in breast cancer research. 

Click here to make a donation.

Support research across all types of breast cancer

Q&A: Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Find out more about the latest in research, treatments and genetics relating to Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Latest Articles

navigating breast cancer and participating in the cambria-2 clinical trial
breast cancer ultrasound

Breast Cancer Ultrasound